A stronger Pool Express option
Dolphin E10 and Niya Sonar 10 are compared feature by feature below. For a stronger Pool Express option, consider Dolphin Escape. Inground and above-ground pools up to 30 ft that need floor cleaning.
Niya Sonar
Niya Sonar 10
Above-ground pools up to 20 ft that need the floor vacuumed without a cord.
What we recommend instead
Dolphin Escape
Inground and above-ground pools up to 30 ft that need floor cleaning.
$669
Buy Dolphin EscapeDolphin E10 or Niya Sonar 10: our take
Dolphin E10 and Niya Sonar 10 are compared on pool fit, cleaning reach, debris handling, controls and ownership details. The recommendation is based on the job the robot must do—not a simple feature count.
Pool fit and cleaning reach
Dolphin E10 is intended for above-ground pools, while Niya Sonar 10 is intended for inground and above-ground pools. Dolphin E10 is rated for pools up to 33 ft; Niya Sonar 10 is rated up to 20 ft. Each cleans floor, so coverage alone does not separate them. Dolphin E10 lists 1 active brush. Niya Sonar 10 lists Dual drive motors.
Filtration and debris
Both models include Basket.
Controls and day-to-day ownership
Both models provide one-touch starts and power-supply controls. Dolphin E10 uses a 40 ft corded cable, while Niya Sonar 10 uses cordless battery power.
Price, warranty and the decision
Dolphin E10 is listed at $499 and Niya Sonar 10 at $149; Niya Sonar 10 is $350 less. Dolphin E10 lists a 2-year warranty compared with 1 years for Niya Sonar 10. Dolphin E10 and Niya Sonar 10 each have a specific fit, but neither is the Pool Express pick for this job. Our better alternative is Dolphin Escape. Inground and above-ground pools up to 30 ft that need floor cleaning.
Feature check: what each robot actually has
A green check means the feature is documented as included. A red X means it is documented as absent. A dash means the source does not make the feature clear.
| Feature | Dolphin E10 | Niya Sonar 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cleans the pool floor | Yes | Yes |
| Climbs and cleans walls | No | No |
| Scrubs the waterline | No | No |
| Fine-debris filter included | No | No |
| Large-debris filter | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic scheduling | No | No |
| Smartphone app | No | No |
| Anti-tangle swivel | Not listed | Not listed |
| 3-year warranty | No | No |
| No recharging between cycles | YesEdge | No |
| Built-in UV-C water treatment | No | No |
Unknown is not treated as “no.” Specifications come from the product pages, current catalog records and manufacturer material collected for this site.
Where Dolphin E10 stands out
Dolphin E10 is the better fit for pools up to 33 ft.
- Carries a 2-year warranty instead of 1 years
- Is rated for pools up to 33 ft
- Runs from continuous plug-in power without a recharge between cycles
Where Niya Sonar 10 stands out
Niya Sonar 10 is the better fit for shoppers prioritizing the lower $149 starting price.
- Is listed $350 lower
- Cordless, about 1 hour per charge
Dolphin E10 vs Niya Sonar 10 specifications
Use pool fit first. Price and app control do not make up for a robot that cannot cover the length or surfaces you need cleaned.
| Specification | Dolphin E10 | Niya Sonar 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Above-ground pools up to 33 ft that need floor cleaning. | Above-ground pools up to 20 ft that need the floor vacuumed without a cord. |
| Starting price | $499 | $149 |
| Pool type | Above-ground | Inground, Above-ground |
| Maximum pool length | Up to 33 ft | Up to 20 ft |
| Cleaning coverage | Floor | Floor |
| Power | Corded | Cordless |
| Filtration | Basket | Basket |
| Scheduling | One-touch start | One-touch start |
| App and remote | Power-supply controls | Power-supply controls |
| Cable | 40 ft | Cordless |
| Robot weight | Not listed | 7.1 lb |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 years |
Consider the stronger Pool Express option
Dolphin E10 and Niya Sonar 10 are compared feature by feature below. For a stronger Pool Express option, consider Dolphin Escape. Inground and above-ground pools up to 30 ft that need floor cleaning.
More robotic pool cleaner comparisons
Keep comparing without rebuilding the same specification table yourself.
Help me choose

